Legal Opinion

South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. Markel

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 22, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Coukt by

Judge Oabeoll

— Affirming.

The appellee, Markel; claiming that while attempting to alight in the night from one of the cars of the appellant company, he was caused to slip and fall from the step of the car on account of snow and ice that had accumulated on the step, by reason of which he sustained personal injuries, brought this suit against the company and had a verdict and judgment for five hundred dollars.

*626The answer of the company was a denial and á plea of contribntory negligence.

The appellee, the only witness in his behalf, after saying that he was on his way, as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Louisville Railway Co. v. ParkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. VaniceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Northcutt v. Cincinnati, Newport & Covington Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API