Szilvasy v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appeal is taken from a conviction for murder. After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed punishment at life. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Szilvasy v. State, 663 S.W.2d 530 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1983).
In his petition for discretionary review, appellant maintains that the Court of Appeals erroneously concluded that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to corroborate testimony given by the accomplice Mazur. Specifically, appellant directs our attention to that portion of the opinion by the Court…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Szilvasy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
4Cited by10 opinions
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Ethridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.