Morse v. Fall River Line Pier, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWhittemobe, J.
These are the defendant’s exceptions in an action of contract in which the plaintiff had a verdict for breach of a contract for his employment as pier manager for three years from March 1,1957.
1. The defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was rightly denied.
The defendant relies on the absence of any action by directors valid to impose an obligation upon the corporation. The evidence shows at best a de facto board. The directors who acted to make the contract should have been elected by the members (an ex officio board of ten Fall River officials) but were elected by the directors. When the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brick v. BosworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Lazenby v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Sears v. Corr Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Clark v. Inhabitants of EastonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Commonwealth v. EnwrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Virginia T. Gillentine v. Maxwell N. McKeand Lawrence MooreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Estate of Moulton v. PuopoloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Granderson v. Carpenter (In Re Granderson)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2000