Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Lee Burroughs

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1995No. 94-30212Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

72 F.3d 136

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Charles Lee BURROUGHS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-30212.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 13, 1995.

Decided Dec. 6, 1995.

Before: WRIGHT, FERNANDEZ, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM*

2

Burroughs argues that the trial court erred in denying…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael S. Brandon, United States of America v. Melanie R. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. David Olon HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Scott Robin RostonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Pickands, Mather & Co. v. H. A. &. D. W. Kuhn & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API