Legal Opinion

Strong v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 16, 1997No. 96 Civ. 2735 (SAS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:

Petitioner David Strong asks this Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, seeking relief from the special parole term imposed upon him by Respondent the United States Parole Commission (“Parole Commission” or “Commission”). Petitioner challenges the Commission’s statutory authority to revoke his initial term of special parole and to reimprison him after he tested positive for cocaine use. He also challenges both the Parole Commission’s continuing jurisdiction over him following revocation of his initial special…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bobby Battle v. U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. David Strong v. U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Caldwell v. SpearsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  3. Manso v. PatrickDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API