State Ex Rel. Elson v. Koehr
Supreme Court of Missouri
1DissentHolstein, Judge
I respectfully dissent. As the majority opinion acknowledges, the term “agent” has more than one definition. Thus, when undefined in a statute, the word lends itself to judicial construction. In this particular statute, the word “agent” is modified by the phrase “for the transaction of [the corporation’s] usual and customary business.” This phrase has the effect of compounding the ambiguity.
Whenever ambiguity exists in a statute, it is the responsibility of the courts to construe the statute consistently with what the legislature intended. MaGee v. Blue Ridge Prof. Bldg., 821 S.W.2d 889, 843…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- David Ranken, Jr. Technical Institute v. BoykinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Milligan v. Southern Express, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
- Litzinger v. Pulitzer Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Rhodes v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- Rouse v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.