Stroot v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Teresa J. James, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (ECF No. 18) and Plaintiff's Motion to Extend the Deadline to File a Motion to Compel (ECF No. 20). Both motions relate to a dispute between the parties regarding the sufficiency of the administrative record. Both motions are fully briefed, and on February 21, 2019, the Court heard further argument from the parties during a telephone status conference. During the conference, the Court ruled on the sufficiency of the administrative record, denied Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend her…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Wilkerson v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Anderson v. SuitersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Mark Stephan v. Unum Life Insurance Company OfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Phillips v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension TrustDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021