Legal Opinion

Candy v. Hanmore

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 8186PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

We take the following succinct statement of the facts in this case from appellee’s brief: This was a claim filed by appellee against the estate of which appellant is administrator, and at first consisted of a note and an account for money had and received. The note ivas allowed by the administrator, and an answer in two paragraphs was *126filed to the account, the first paragraph of the answer being a general denial of the account, and the second paragraph averring that the money had and received was received by appellant’s intestate, as guardian of appellee, and that said…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bosseker v. CramerIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Parsons v. MilfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Goodwin v. GoodwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Caldwell v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1845
  5. Barnes v. BartlettIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Buck v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Indiana Trust Co. v. GriffithIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Deegan Ex Rel. Neligh v. DeeganNevada Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Moxley v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Carver v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API