Legal Opinion

Gehen v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court *1027did not abuse its discretion in ordering defendants to “show a good faith effort” to produce four former employees for depositions in Erie County (see, MS Partnership v Wal-Mart Stores, 273 AD2d 858, 858-859). The court erred, however, in further ordering defendants to pay plaintiffs counsel’s costs and plaintiffs expenses in procuring the testimony. Any expenses incurred by a party in connection with discovery should be paid by the party incurring the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MS Partnership v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Morgan v. Dell Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smart v. RivetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. SMART, LUKE DOUGLAS v. RIVET, JR., DANFORTH J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Smart v. RivetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API