Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Snow v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 22, 1987No. M-84-556Published

1Concurrence

PARKS, Judge,

specially concurring:

I write separately to address the privilege which exists between physician and patient. As correctly explained by Judge Brett, only communications which are not intended to be disclosed to third parties fall within this privilege. See 12 O.S.1981, § 2503. Because this is a statutory privilege, and in derogation of common law, the legislation creating this privilege must be strictly construed. See State v. George, 575 P.2d 511, 515 (Kan.1978).

Hammonds v. State, 366 P.2d 111 (Okla.Crim.App.1961), which was decided under the old statute, involved a similar…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Hammonds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API