Legal Opinion
Habrat v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 31, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 68-1173PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOURLEY, Senior District Judge.
This is an action under the General Maritime Laws against the United States of America. The deceased plaintiff seaman served on the vessel Kenmar where he worked in the engine room. He had worked in that capacity for approximately a year. A day after he took leave from the vessel he was found dead from a heart attack. It is claimed working conditions and carelessness about his condition and need of assistance creates a cause of action based on negligence and the unseaworthiness of the vessel.
The immediate matter before the Court is Motion of the United…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Klishewich v. Mediterranean Agencies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1969
- Saridis v. SS PARAMARINADistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1962
3Cited by6 opinions
- Obbie Mallard and Daisy Mallard, His Wife v. Aluminum Company of Canada, Ltd., Obbie Mallard, Daisy Mallard, His Wife v. The M/v "Germundo", a Finnish Flag Vessel, Her Engine, Tackle and Appurtenances, Etc. In Rem Rederiaktiebolaget Gustaf Erikson and Consolidated-Bathurst Limited, in Personam, Defendants- Obbie Mallard and Daisy Mallard, His Wife v. The M/v "Germundo," Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Mallard v. Aluminum Co. of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Claude Bernard v. U. S. Lines, Incorporated v. Ryan Stevedoring Co., Inc. And the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Daigle v. Coastal Marine, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Dougherty v. Navigazione San Paolo, S.P.A. Medafrica LineDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.