State v. Crowley
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stukes, Justice.
Appellant was 'convicted of perjury on account of 'his testimony at a prior trial of others upon an indictment for murder. He has appealed and presents two questions, the first of which follows: Did the court err in permitting the State to introduce into evidence and present to the. jury all of the testimony given by the defendant in the former trial.
The State produced as a witness the official court stenographer'who took'the testimony at the former trial by shorthand, transcribed his notes, and his transcript was offered in evidence. Appellant’s counsel expressly stated that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Caldwell v. DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Piero v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- McKain v. Camden Water, Light & Ice Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Mitchum v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Tucker v. CatoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- State v. HudginsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Cogdill v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.