Legal Opinion

Ex Parte State, 1101398 (Ala. 12-2-2011)

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 2, 2011No. 1101398PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STUART, Justice.

This case involves the admissibility into evidence of a child witness’s prior inconsistent out-of-court statements. Pursuant to Rule 39(a)(1)(C), Ala. RApp. P., this Court granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari to address “a material question ... of first impression”: Whether § 15-25-31, Ala.Code 1975, a part of the Child Physical and Sexual Abuse Victim Protection Act, § 15-25-30 et seq., Ala.Code 1975 (“the Act”), conflicts with the Alabama Rules of Evidence, specifically Rule 801(d)(1)(A), Ala. R. Evid. In M.L.H. v. State, 99 So.3d 894 (Ala.Crim.App.2011),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schoenvogel v. Venator Group Retail, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. T.P. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  3. Biles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Gwarjanski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  5. Corona Coal & Iron Co. v. CallahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API