Legal Opinion

Manning v. Manning

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1895Published

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Mary Manning against John B. Manning for an accounting. From an order granting a motion to set aside the referee’s report, and the interlocutory judgment entered thereon, defendant appeals.

1Per curiam

The learned judge at special term, in his statement of the reasons which persuaded him to set aside the report of the referee, directing the entry of an interlocutory judgment, requiring the defendant “to account to the plaintiff” for all interest, income, and profits arising out of or resulting from the accounts opened by him in her name, and that he pay over and deliver to her all certificates of stock, bonds, bank notes, money, or other property which, upon said accounting, may be found to be due to her,” and the interlocutory judgment entered thereon, conceded that, in some cases, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Garczynski v. RussellNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Seymour v. Spring Forest Cemetery Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API