Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People of Michigan v. Charles William Wood

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 2017No. 331462Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Murray, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

*429A Michigan State Police Trooper pulled defendant over for speeding. When the trooper reached the vehicle, he saw approximately a dozen "whippet" or nitrous oxide containers in the backseat, along with some empty pill bottles. Knowing that canisters containing nitrous oxide are used for "huffing," which is illegal under state law, the trooper asked defendant when he last huffed. Defendant answered, "[F]our days ago." The majority concludes that the trooper did not, at that point, have probable cause to search the vehicle. But because…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API