Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dalton v. Hill

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1880PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mandamus. Mandamus against the judge and the prosecuting attorney of the eighteenth judicial circuit to compel them to .certify to the State Auditor for payment by the State, a bill of fees alleged to be due seventy-five witnesses summoned on the part of the defendant, but not examined in •the criminal case of the State against Gibson.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

The Hon. Y. B. Hill, judge of the .eighteenth judicial circuit, has made return to the alternal. costs in crimi- tive writ herein, and the demurrer of reNAL cases: wit- . . ness fees. lator questions the sufficiency, and admits •the truth of the allegations of such return. The facts which thus stand admitted are : 1st. That the fees of all •witnesses examined by the defendant, G. B. Gibson, on his *513trial, were certified to the State Auditor for payment. 2nd. That said judge refused to certify the fees of the witnesses set out in the alternative writ, because such witnesses were neither…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Keck v. SeibertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Baker v. FrakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. State ex rel. Jacobi v. HeegeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. State ex rel. WilderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  5. State ex rel. Houser v. OliverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API