Legal Opinion

Picarello v. Zilberman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 27, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated May 1, 2002, as, upon granting the plaintiffs motion for leave to reargue their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, which had previously been determined by order dated January 15, 2002, denied their motion.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that whether a dangerous condition exists on real property so as to create liability on the part…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trincere v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Cupo v. KarfunkelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Chambers v. ShowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Smith v. A.B.K. Apartments, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Adsmond v. City of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DiVietro v. Gould Palisades Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API