Legal Opinion

Nick L. Surowka and Christine L. Surowka v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1990No. 89-1954PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs filed suit to recover the taxes, interest, and penalties imposed for failing to file a 1977 federal income tax return, a return plaintiffs claim was timely filed. The district court granted summary judgment for the government, holding that plaintiffs failure to send their return by registered mail, 26 U.S.C. § 7502 (1989), precluded them from relying upon circumstantial evidence to prove that their 1977 federal income tax return was timely filed. Plaintiffs appeal.

We hold 26 U.S.C. § 7502 provides only two exceptions to the physical delivery rule for the filing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brian Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. David Deutsch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Estate of Wood v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  4. Bruder v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Lois Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. James B. Thomas, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Sorrentino v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. James R. Carroll and Dorothy A. Carroll v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. In Re Mark Smith, Debtor. Mark Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API