Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1922No. 12680Published

Action for damages; from Upson superior court — Judge Searcy. July 2, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

Except as modified by tbe provisions of Civil Code (1910), §§ 2788, 2789, it is tbe general rule tbat before a suit can be maintained against a receiver of a railroad company it is necessary that tbe consent of tbe court appointing him be obtained. Fried v. Sullivan, 27 Ga. App. 326 (108 S. E. 127). The petition in tbe instant ease having failed to show a compliance with this requirement, and not being governed by the provisions of the code sections mentioned, it not being a suit based on tort, for damage to personalty on account of the failure of the defendant to comply with its common-law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Chattanooga Southern Railroad v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Fried v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. SnellgroveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API