Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Hetrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 25, 1991Published

1Dissent

Mikoll, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent.

County Court improperly denied defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence. The issuing court failed to interview the nine-year-old child upon whose statements the application for a search warrant was based or anyone else so as to ascertain the child’s understanding of the nature of an oath. The record indicates that Police Officer James Kowulich, who applied for the search warrant, testified at the suppression hearing that the court issuing the warrant did not interview the child affiant or any other person.

" '[U]nder CPL 60.20 (subd 2), a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. NisoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. People v. JacobsonNew York Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API