Legal Opinion
Buono v. Norton
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 8, 2005No. EDCV 01-216RTSGLXPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER 1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE PERMANENT INJUNCTION, 2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY THE INJUNCTION AS MOOT, AND 3) PERMANENTLY ENJOINING DEFENDANTS’ IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 8121 OF PUBLIC LAW 108-87
TIMLIN, District Judge.
The court, Judge Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered plaintiff Frank Buono (“Plaintiff”)’s motion to enforce or, in the alternative, modify the permanent injunction (“motion”), defendants Gale Norton, Secretary of the Interior, Jonathan Jarvis, Regional Director of the Pacific West Region of the Department of Interior, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lee v. WeismanSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Santa Fe Independent School District v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Buono v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Georgia Mae Downs v. Roberta SawtelleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc., and Clarence Reinders v. City of Marshfield, Wisconsin and Henry Praschak Memorial Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Salazar v. BuonoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Buono v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Buono v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Buono v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Buono v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.