Legal Opinion

Quality Coal Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided June 3, 1946No. Civ. A. No. 527PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Arkansas, and at all times material to the present proceeding was engaged in mining and selling coal, and employed more than eight persons. As such it was subject to the state Unemployment Compensation Law, Act 155 of 1937, Acts of Arkansas, Pope’s Digest • of the Statutes of Arkansas, Section 8549 *106et seq., and to the tax imposed by Title IX of the Social Security Act of 1935, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1101 et ,=eq., as amended by 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 1600 et seq.

For the years 1938, 1939 and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Shaw v. Kentucky Unemployment Compensation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. United States v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilmington Country Club v. Unemployment Insurance Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  2. People Ex Rel. Bernardi v. Bethune Plaza, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. SPECIAL CARE v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API