Legal Opinion

Prout v. Grout

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Lawrence county; the Hon. Richard S. Canby, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

This was an action, brought by Hath an R. Grout, against Elmer Grout, in the circuit court of Lawrence county.

A writ of attachment was issued, and served on TJri S. Prout and George W. Prout, plaintiffs in error, as garnishees.

At the October term, 1870, of the court, the plaintiffs in error answered interrogatories which had been filed by Hathan R. Grout, the plaintiff. The answer to the second and third interrogatories was as follows:

“To second and third interrogatories: We jointly and severally had given our promissory note, for value received, to one Charles Lamott, for the sum of $700,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Handy v. DobbinNew York Supreme Court · 1815

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gebbie v. MooneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Morgan v. Saline Valley BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  3. Rhea v. PowellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
  4. Bidle v. HamiltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API