Legal Opinion

Eldridge v. Weinberger

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided April 9, 1973No. Civ. A. 72-C-167-APublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

TURK, District Judge.

This action challenges the constitutionality of the procedures employed by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare to terminate disability benefits. The merits of plaintiff’s claim that he is disabled are not before this court since he has not exhausted his administrative remedies, but has instead chosen to challenge the procedures for terminating disability payments as being repugnant to the due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Specifically, plaintiff contends that he should have been afforded an…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Arlene Mattern, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Plato v. RoudebushDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Brown v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API