State v. Sabot

[¶ 1] Eric Sabot appeals from a criminal judgment, entered after a bench trial, finding him guilty of terrorizing. Sabot argues the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to convict him of terrorizing. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding sufficient evidence supports Sabot’s conviction.

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jon J. Jensen Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers