Legal Opinion

Arthur Marcus v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 28, 1962No. 14013_1PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUMBAULD, District Judge.

Appellant, Arthur Marcus, a resident of Massachusetts, was called as a witness before a federal grand jury at Wilmington, Delaware, on April 2, 1962. He was advised of his rights under the Fifth Amendment, and thereupon refused to answer, relying upon his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, when asked if he had been investigated by the Massachusetts Crime Commission in 1957 and whether he had in 1955 appealed to the Massachusetts Public Utilities Commission because the telephone company had refused to install twelve telephones in his office, and when…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Riccobene AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Van Horn v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. United States v. Jerome Dimuro, United States of America v. Roland Lung, United States of America v. Victor Santarpio, United States of America v. Joseph Doherty and Thomas HurleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. DiMuroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  5. In Re Grand Jury Investigation of Sam Giancana, in the Matter of the Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Sam Giancana v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API