Davis v. O'Ferrall
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dubuque District Court.
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion hy
Grxenk, J.
I cannot agree with the majority, that a widow is entitled to dower in a more pre-emption 7-ight to land. It is conceded that the law in force at the ciato of the conveyance, nmst govern. At the time, O’Ferrall sold his right to Bissell, the statute of 1839 was in force. This statute gave dower according to the course of the common law. At common law, the widow shall have the third part of all the lands and tenements, whereof the husband was seized in fee simple, or fee tail a': any time during coverture to hold to herself for the term of her natural life. 2…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hunt v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Stow v. TifftNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- Sinclair v. Jackson ex dem. FieldCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1826
- Warren v. LelandNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Inhabitants of Leicester v. Inhabitants of RehobothMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.