Legal Opinion
Mayor, C., Jersey City v. Coppinger
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided May 13, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The bill of complaint is filed to compel the defendants to tear down certain buildings alleged to be private and public nuisances.
The matter is now before the court on the return of an order requiring the defendants to show cause why a preliminary mandatory injuction should not issue forthwith directing them to abate the alleged nuisances on premises known as 258, 260 and 262 Grove street, Jersey City, by reason of imminent danger of collapse of the buildings forming part of said premises, and, unless abated, the complainant be empowered to abate same and charge the cost thereof to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCran v. Public Service Railway Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. KelleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910
- Bailey v. SchnitziusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
- McCran v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
- Wakeman v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spoor-Thompson, C., Co. v. Bennett, C.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Fraxam, C., Corp. v. Skouras, C., Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Moss Ind. v. Irving Metals Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947