Legal Opinion
United States v. Reginald S. Carr
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1995No. 94-3530PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Reginald Carr was convicted by a jury of first-degree murder on federal property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 7(3) and 18 U.S.C. § 1111 (1988). On appeal, Carr alleges that the district court 1 erred in admitting hearsay evidence, disallowing testimony, excusing witnesses on Fifth Amendment grounds, refusing to suppress an identification of him, and admitting photographs of the victim. He also challenges the government’s use of peremptory strikes, argues that his trial counsel was ineffective, and questions the sufficiency of the evidence against him. We affirm.
On…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Michael BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Rayful Edmond, IIICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Rodney McGautha v. Jackson County, Missouri, Collections DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Forriss D. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- George Carter v. Frank X. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Jose O. Martinez, Also Known as Daniel Alejo, Also Known as Pedro C. AlejoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Argentra CodyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Ivan Dejesus Mejia-UribeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.