Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Trustees of Sailors' Snug Harbor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1950Published

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

The parties hereto submit this controversy pursuant to sections 546-548 of the Civil Practice Act. The Attorney-General of the State of New York, plaintiff herein, basically contends that the corporate defendant, The Sailor’s Snug Harbor, must be administered by not less than eight active, competent and qualified trustees; that a quorum of not less than five is required to transact any of the business of the corporate defendant; and that this court should appoint trustees. There are presently six competent and qualified trustees, one of whom, Honorable William O’Dwyer, Mayor of the City of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Sailors' Snug Harbor v. CarmodyNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. City of Boston v. DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Cohen v. Manufacturers Safe Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Higginson v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Trustees of the Sailors' Snug Harbor v. CarmodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API