Legal Opinion

Hodge v. TEXACO USA

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided January 24, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-2507-OPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING

NAUMAN S. SCOTT, District Judge.

Before us is a Motion pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6) filed by defendant Laboratory Specialists, Inc. (LSI).

Plaintiff was employed by defendant Texaco USA until December 5, 1988. On that date, Texaco terminated plaintiff because plaintiff had failed a drug test. Previously, on November 1, 1988, Texaco ordered plaintiff to submit to a drug test. At the request of Texaco, Mobile Health Test Services, Ltd., obtained a urine sample from the plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges that Mobile used supplies, techniques and procedures prescribed for the collection of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gerald M. Madison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. David J. Hodge v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Landrum v. Board of Commissioners of the Orleans Levee DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1991
  3. David J. Hodge v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API