Legal Opinion

Garland D. Jarman v. Department of the Navy

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 20, 1998No. 96-3390PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

The only question we decide is whether the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) correctly dismissed for lack of jurisdiction the petitioner’s appeal challenging his removal by the Department of the Navy. The answer, as we explain, turns on whether in rescinding a prior removal the Navy had returned the petitioner to the status quo ante. We hold that the Navy had not restored him to the status quo ante and that the Board therefore erred in dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We reverse that decision and remand to the Board for further proceedings…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gary D. Austin, Ann Crispin, Arlana Hines, Anola Nightengale v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Michael J. Bruning v. Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zinn v. Department of ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Cooper v. Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. Delaney v. U.S. International Development AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API