Spencer Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentBeezer, Circuit Judge
It is well established that the decision to grant or deny a visa petition is discretionary. The opinion of the court filed today is the first to hold that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(rL) does not bar federal court jurisdiction over a discretionary decision of the Attorney General. The court’s opinion improperly holds that we have jurisdiction. In doing so, the court creates an inter-circuit and intra-circuit split. In addition, the court fails to give due deference to the Executive Branch in the immigration context.
I respectfully dissent.
I
The court’s opinion relies on general federal question…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.