Legal Opinion · Dissent

Spencer Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 17, 2003No. 01-16391Published

1DissentBeezer, Circuit Judge

It is well established that the decision to grant or deny a visa petition is discretionary. The opinion of the court filed today is the first to hold that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(rL) does not bar federal court jurisdiction over a discretionary decision of the Attorney General. The court’s opinion improperly holds that we have jurisdiction. In doing so, the court creates an inter-circuit and intra-circuit split. In addition, the court fails to give due deference to the Executive Branch in the immigration context.

I respectfully dissent.

I

The court’s opinion relies on general federal question…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API