Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cobern HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, OF the UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1992No. 91-3160Published

1ConcurrenceKane, Senior District Judge

I concur with the well-reasoned opinion of the court, believing that under the circumstances of the case, Claimant Hamilton was not prejudiced. I write this concurring opinion because I think the procedures used at the district court were inappropriate. Since, however, these issues were not raised in the briefs, the views expressed here are not, in my view, appropriate for the opinion of the court.

This case was decided on appeal by the district court on the basis of a “Motion to Affirm” filed by the Secretary. This so-called motion to affirm is not authorized by Congress and in fact is…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Elizabeth J. HAMMOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis BOWEN, Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. George BOWEN, SS #252-78-4071, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Cristobal SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Garcia v. CalifanoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API