State v. Fichter
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
Defendant, and two others, were indicted for larceny from the person. ORS 164.840. Defendant was tried separately and convicted. This appeal is primarily directed at the court’s failure to order a directed verdict of acquittal. The assignment complains basically of lack of evidence to show that defendant aided and abetted one of the other defendants in the crime charged. We will relate the facts before specific mention of the issues presented. In doing so we ignore defendant’s denials of the facts stated. The evidence is to be viewed in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Rosser,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. RosserOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. WeitzelOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. ReynerOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. BroomOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. GoodloeOregon Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. StarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. Lopez-MinjarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. AnlaufCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. ShipmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.