Legal Opinion

Tiger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 26, 2000No. 4D00-2030PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

764 So.2d 824 (2000)

Edward TIGER, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D00-2030.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 26, 2000.

Daniel L. Castillo, Tampa, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

2Per curiam

We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion claiming that his habitual offender sentence is illegal under State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999). Thompson held that chapter 95-182, the law under which appellant was sentenced, violated the single subject rule of article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution. See id. at 649. That…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1999

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. James v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Cookshot v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Benedetto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. DANNY R. ENNIS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API