Legal Opinion

Draisma v. United States

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 23, 1980No. 78-441PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, District Judge.

This is an action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq. as authorized by the National Swine Flu Immunization Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 247b(k)(l). Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on June 20, 1978 after complying with the administrative claims procedure required by the FTCA. Shortly thereafter the action was transferred to the District of Columbia for coordinated pretrial proceedings under the guidance of Judge Gesell. At the close of 1979, after his final pretrial order, Judge Gesell remanded the case to this Court for further…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Felder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. Joyce O'connor, as Administratrix of the Estate of Benedict O'connor, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. Tiffany v. the Christman Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Gowdy v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Canavin v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Smith v. Millers Mut. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Dyer v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1982
  4. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Earl v. Bouchard Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API