Legal Opinion

Lentz v. City of Dallas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1903No. 1159PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to the court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Dallas County. Addie Lentz sued the city of Dallas for personal injuries from a defective sidewalk. Plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant appealed. The judgment being reversed and rendered for appellant, the appellee, plaintiff below, procured a writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

Plaintiff, a child 10 years of age, stepped into a hole in a grating upon one of the sidewalks in Dallas, and for the injuries sustained recovered a judgment against the city, which on appeal was reversed by the Court of Civil Appeals, and judgment was rendered by that court in favor of the city. This action of the Court of Civil Appeals, was based upon a provision of the charter of Dallas which was construed as exempting the city from the liability asserted against it. The evidence showed that the owner of a building which abutted upon the sidewalk had made an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HarriettTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hutcheson v. StorrieTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Town of Macon v. PattyMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Woodbridge v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Insurance Company of North America v. MyersTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Fisher v. Coastal Transport Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. PowersTexas Supreme Court · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API