McBride, Sheldon & Co. v. Protection Ins.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
This was a scire facias, in a process of foreign attachment, setting forth a judgment, obtained by the plaintiffs, before the superior court for Hartford county, on the fourth Tuesday of January, 1850, against Harvey B. Anderson, Loyal C. Anderson and Hobart Nickerson, all of Coral, in the state of Illinois, partners in company, under the name and firm of H. B. Anderson &' Co. The cause was tried at Hartford, January term, 1853, when the court found the facts, of which the…
Read the full summary
This was a scire facias, in a process of foreign attachment, setting forth a judgment, obtained by the plaintiffs, before the superior court for Hartford county, on the fourth Tuesday of January, 1850, against Harvey B. Anderson, Loyal C. Anderson and Hobart Nickerson, all of Coral, in the state of Illinois, partners in company, under the name and firm of H. B. Anderson &' Co. The cause was tried at Hartford, January term, 1853, when the court found the facts, of which the following are those which are material. The original suit, referred to in the scire facias, was instituted, by writ,…
1Opinion of the CourtStorrs, J.
In the writ in the original action of assumpsit,
brought by these plaintiffs, which is referred to in the declaration, in this case, the defendants were described to be “ Henry B. Anderson and Harvey Nickerson, of Coral, in the state of Illinois, partners in company, under the name and firm of H. B. Anderson & Co.; ” and the defendants, in the present suit, are alleged, in the factorizing clause, to be “ the attorneys, agents, factors, trustees and debtors of the said defendants” in that action. That writ was, after the return thereof, amended by the plaintiffs, by permission of the court to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Morgan v. FarrelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Sanborn v. NealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- Estate of McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Strong v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892