Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Heck

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an appeal from a decree that an inheritance tax of $3,886.20 is due the state upon succession of certain heirs to property of the estate of Mary J. Heck, deceased. The administrator does not question the finding of the trial court as to the value of the estate ($193,500.79) or the method in which the inheritance tax was computed, but asserts that the law, Sections 1191 and 1192, Or. L., purporting to authorize such tax, is unconstitutional in that it conflicts with Article I, Sections 20 and 32, and Article IX, Section 1 of the Constitution of Oregon. Appellant, in assignments of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Maxwell v. BugbeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tharalson v. State Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State Tax Commission v. BackmanUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. In Re Henry's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. In Re the Estate of LloydWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Matthews v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API