Legal Opinion
The Travelers Indemnity Co., a Connecticut Corporation v. Ewing, Cole, Erdman & Eubank, a Pennsylvania Partnership. Ewing, Cole, Erdman & Eubank
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 22, 1983No. 82-5390PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, Ewing, Cole, Erdman & Eubank (Ewing, Cole), an architectural firm, challenges the judgment of the district court that it is liable in tort for damages incurred by its client. Because we determine that the plaintiff failed to carry its burden of proving that Ewing, Cole had not met the standards of a reasonably prudent architect, we reverse.
I
This dispute arises out of the construction of student dormitory housing for the New Brunswick campus of Rutgers University. The New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority (the Authority) and Ewing,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Michelin Tires (Canada) Ltd. v. First National Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States Ex Rel. Freddie M. Johnson v. Robert L. Johnson, Superintendent, Appeal of the Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- En Hui Huang v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Micron Technology, Inc. v. Rambus Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Allen BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Brown v. Interbay Funding LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Micron Technology, Inc. v. Rambus Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.