Legal Opinion

United States v. Marcus

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 7, 2010No. Docket 07-4005-crPublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESLEY, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-Appellant was convicted following a jury trial on charges of violating the forced labor and sex trafficking provisions of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (“TVPA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1589, 1591. In an opinion dated August 14, 2008, this Court vacated the judgment and remanded the case on the ground that, under plain error review, Marcus’s convictions violated the Ex Post Facto Clause. United States v. Marcus, 538 F.3d 97 (2d Cir.2008) (per curiam).

The Supreme Court reversed and remanded. Noting that Marcus’s contention implicated the Due Process Clause, 1 the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. United States v. James and MallayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. Elat v. NgoubeneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  4. United States v. Jordie CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. BaderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API