Legal Opinion

Utica Mutual Insurance v. Tucker

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1986Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Anthony F. Shaheen, J.

Respondent Michelle Tucker sustained injuries while riding *921as a passenger in a vehicle insured by the petitioner insurance carrier, when the vehicle went under an overpass and a rimless tire smashed through the windshield. The petitioner carrier denied Ms. Tucker coverage under the uninsured motorists provision of the vehicle’s policy on the grounds that there was no uninsured vehicle involved in the accident. Ms. Tucker filed a demand for arbitration under the uninsured motorists portion of the policy to challenge the denial of coverage. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Allstate Insurance v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Diaz v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. In re the Arbitration between Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. & HollerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API