Legal Opinion

Brenn v. Saul

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 27, 2021No. 4:19-cv-07717Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LLOYD B., 7 Case No. 19-cv-07717-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT ANDREW SAUL, 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 14 Defendant. 11 12 Plaintiff Lloyd B. moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social 13 Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found 14 Plaintiff not disabled and therefore denied him application for benefits under Title II of the Social 15 Security Act,

42 U.S.C. § 401

et seq. [Docket Nos. 13 (“Pltf. Mot.”), 17 (“Reply”).]…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API