Legal Opinion

Rizzo v. Nichols

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 2004No. 2003-1394PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

867 So.2d 73 (2004)

Jasper and Mary RIZZO

v.

Heath NICHOLS.

No. 2003-1394.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 3, 2004.

Eugene P. Cicardo, Jr., Alexandria, LA, for Plaintiffs/Appellees: Jasper and Mary Rizzo.

Malcolm X. Larvadain, Alexandria, LA, for Defendant/Appellant: Heath Nichols.

Court composed of SYLVIA R. COOKS, MARC T. AMY, and ELIZABETH A. PICKETT, Judges.

AMY, Judge.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, sought recovery for damage that occurred after the defendant changed the natural drainage of water across the plaintiffs' property. The trial judge determined that the defendant had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Town of BallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Barrett v. TL James & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Kolder v. State Farm Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Begnaud v. Camel Contractors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Branch v. City of LafayetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stanford v. Town of BallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Taylor v. HaddoxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Dewing Hickerson v. State of La., Dept of Public Safety & CorrectionsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Randy Stanford v. Town of BallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API