Legal Opinion

W. J. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1887No. 2082PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Freestone. Tried below before the Hon. L. D. Bradley. This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment upon the forfeited appearance bond of W. J. alias W. T. Harrell • alias Sam Pryor, bailed under a pretended indictment charging him with cattle theft. The amount of the bond and judgment was two hundred dollars.

1Opinion of the Court

Willson, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment final upon a forfeited bail bond. The bail bond was executed under a pretended indictment- which had been presented by a body of fourteen persons assuming to act as a grand jury. Such, pretended indictment was a nullity, and all process and proceedings thereunder were void. (Lott v. The State, 18 Texas Ct. App., 627; McNeese v. The State, 19 Texas Ct. App, 48; Swain and Turner v. The State, Id., 323; Williams v. The State, Id., 265.)

The judgment is reversed and the proceeding upon the bail bond is dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WittOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. The City of Chicago v. TerminielloIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API