Legal Opinion

State v. Cheatham

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 2009No. 44,247-KAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPeatross, J.

| pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Defendant, Mary Cheatham, pled guilty to two counts of forgery and was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment at hard labor on each count, with the sentences to be served concurrently with each other, but consecutive to any other sentence. Defendant now appeals. For the reasons stated herein, the portion of Defendant’s sentence ordering her sentences are to be served *1049consecutively with any other sentence, specifically the sentence in Docket No. 149,-510, is vacated and the matter is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with the plea…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. DortheySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. State v. BonannoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CheathamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API