Legal Opinion
United States of America, in 03-1810 v. William H. Randolph, in 03-1620
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 7, 2004No. 03-1620, 03-1810PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLLAK, District Judge.
William H. Randolph appeals from a judgment 'of conviction for sexual exploitation of children under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Randolph contends that the sexual exploitation statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), is unconstitutional on its face and as applied to him. 1 We disagree, and we therefore affirm the judgment of conviction.
Randolph also appeals from the imposition of an enhanced prison sentence — a fifteen-year minimum sentence plus eight months for a total of 188 months — imposed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2251(d). Section 2251(d) mandates a ten-year minimum sentence for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Edwards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Cyrus R. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Paul PavulakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Michael WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. William DahlCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- United States v. George Atiyeh United States of America v. George AtiyehCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Geoffry KoueviCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.