Legal Opinion

Santana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 7, 1996No. 95-2227PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GERSTEN, Judge.

Appellant, Pablo Francisco Santana (defendant), appeals his convictions and sentences for attempted first degree murder with a firearm, aggravated battery with a firearm, and shooting or throwing a deadly missile. We affirm.

The defendant claims that the trial court erred by imposing a longer term sentence than he would have received had he not proceeded to trial. Prior to trial, the State offered the defendant a ten-year sentence in exchange for his plea of guilty. The defendant chose to proceed to trial, was found guilty, and received a guidelines sentence of fourteen years…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. City of Daytona Beach v. Del PercioSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. A.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Fraley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. State v. Randy HughsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. Edwards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. State v. ElsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API