Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Henry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 21, 1922No. 11467PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District 'Court, Sequoyah County; E. B. Arnold, Judge. Action by Charlie Willie Henry against Fannie Bell Foreman to recover interest in estate. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON. J.

This action was originally commenced by Charlie Willie Henry, defendant in error, against Fanny Bell Foreman, plaintiff in error. The amended petition upon which the cause was tried was filed in the district court of Sequoyah county on the 11th day of May, 1919.

The facts as shown by the testimony were that Fannie Bell Foreman was the second wife of Hiram V. Lender, and stepmother of the defendant in error,. Mrs. Henry’s mother having died when she was about five years of age, and the plaintiff in error having become her stepmother when she was about six or seven years of age. Hiram…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Harding v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Wingate v. RenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Terrapin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stagner v. FilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Price v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Farmers State Bank v. BushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API